Navigation Menu

Guest Editorial: Is culture at war with Christmas?

>> By Russell Moore
Dean, School of Theology, Southern Seminary 

Flipping through magazines on an airplane, I found myself sighing with irritation. An advertisement for Budweiser was tagged with the headline, “Silent Nights are Overrated.” In a second magazine, I saw an ad for a high-end outdoor grill, which read: “Who says it’s better to give than to receive?”

My first reaction was one I’ve critiqued in others, to take some sort of personal, or at least tribal, offense: “Would they advertise in Turkey during Ramadan with the line, ‘Fasting is Overrated?’ or by asking in India, ‘Who says everything is one with the universe?’”

I was missing the point—and that matters.

Every year about this time, there’s a lot of hubbub about a “war on Christmas.” There are legitimate questions of religious liberty involved and complicated church/state questions that we ought to be concerned about. More commonly, though, the outrage is directed toward the commercial marketplace, for replacing “Merry Christmas” with “Happy Holidays” and so on.

As Christians, we ought to recognize that a militant pull toward what Richard John Neuhaus called a “naked public square” is bad for people of any and all religious traditions. But there’s a difference between standing against a school system penalizing a child for writing “Merry Christmas” on her “holiday card” and the huffing and puffing we do when commercial marketers don’t “get” our Christian commitments.

The advertising agencies behind this beer company and this grill corporation are trying to sell products, not offend constituencies. Taking shots at any group’s religious beliefs isn’t good economics, and that’s the point. I’m willing to bet whoever dreamed up these ad campaigns didn’t “get” at all that they might be making fun of Jesus Christ.

Madison Avenue probably didn’t trace through that the song “Silent Night” is about the holy awe of the dawning Incarnation in Bethlehem. It’s just a Christmas song, part of the background music in our culture this time of year. Saying it’s overrated probably didn’t feel any more “insensitive” to these copywriters than making a joke about, say, decking the halls or reindeer games or Heat Miser and Cold Miser.

They probably didn’t think about “It is better to give than to receive” being a quotation from Jesus (Acts 20:35). It probably just seems like a Benjamin Franklin-style aphorism—the same  thing that happens when someone says “scarlet letter” without recognizing Hawthorne or “to be or not to be” while not knowing the difference between Hamlet and Shrek.

We ought not to get outraged by as though we were some protected class of victims. We ought to see the ways our culture is less and less connected with the roots of basic knowledge of Christianity. Many see Christmas in the same way they see Hanukkah. They know about Menorahs and dreidels, but not about the Maccabean fight.

That ought not make us angry, but give us an opportunity to understand how we look to our neighbors. They see us more in terms of our trivialities than in terms of the depths of meaning of Incarnation and blood atonement and the kingdom of Christ. They know something about “Silent Night,” just as they know something about “Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer.” What they don’t recognize is the cosmos-shifting mystery of Immanuel as God with Us.

We need to spend more time lovingly engaging our neighbors with the  news that shocks angels, redirects stargazers and knocks sheep-herders to the ground. It seems increasingly strange is because it is strange. A gospel safe enough to sell beer and barbecue grills is a gospel too safe to make blessings flow, far as the curse is found.

Christmas, then, isn’t about a fight for our right to party. It’s a reminder that we live in a “land of deep darkness” (Isa. 9:2). The darkness isn’t overcome by sarcasm, personal offense or retaliatory insults. The light of Bethlehem shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not, cannot, will not overcome it.

And that’s enough.


Author: Guest Writer

View more articles by Guest Writer.

Share This Post On
  • Gary Capshaw

    That’s enough and you are exactly right. If the importance of the birth of Christ is a mystery to the society as a whole, that should alert us to the fact that we, The Church, must not be representing the Lord the way we’re supposed to.

    If they don’t know about Christ, it’s because we’re not showing them.

  • Merry Christmas, or better yet, Blessed Holy Day!
    A Baptist Perspective by Don Diehl
    I love the song: “Oh Holy Night.” The word “holy” means “set apart as special and unique.” We understand holy night as “the night, Christ was born.” The dictionary defines “holy” this way:
    holy |ˈhōlē|
    adjective ( holier , holiest )
    1 dedicated or consecrated to God or a religious purpose; sacred: i.e. the Holy Bible |
    • (of a person) devoted to the service of God: saints [holy priesthood] and holy men.
    holily |ˈhōləlē|adverb
    Thus: holiday – a day set aside as most holy. And when we come to 2012 the way we are encouraged to express the day and the “holidays” surrounding the (most-agree wrong date of December 25) birth day of Jesus the Christ, we say “Merry Christmas.”
    Now understand, I am in favor of saying such myself, but I wonder if unconsciously, the secularists (humanists and wannabe atheists) haven’t given us a better greeting?
    Try this one: “Happy Holiday.” What? Look at it again and then repeat it as a believer in the Living Lord Jesus. The word “happy” is the Bible word “blessed.” Wow! It get’s better. The word “holi” from “hole” is “holy” so we have from the “Christmas” time money-mad merchant and the PC police, the bold proclamation: “Blessed Holy Day.”
    Which, by the way, from a New Testament (and Baptist) world view is much superior to the term “Merry Christmas” [mass of Christ] anyway.

Read previous post:
Rite of passage parenting: Christmas gold

I heard about an elderly lady who had dropped her handbag in the hustle and bustle of the Christmas crowd....