Navigation Menu

GCRTF podcast with David S. Dockery

DSD

Union University president David S. Dockery delivers a report on the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force to faculty, staff, and students.

Dr. David Dockery looks over the written report of the GCR Task Force before taping a podcast with Messenger Insight moderator, Douglas Baker as Executive Producer Jacob Wright prepares to record the podcast.

Dr. David Dockery looks over the written report of the GCR Task Force before taping a podcast with Messenger Insight moderator, Douglas Baker as Executive Producer Jacob Wright prepares to record the podcast.

In the Fall of 2008, voices began to surface across various places in the Southern Baptist Convention calling for renewal and revival in local congregations and in the agencies, institutions, commissions and entities found by Southern Baptists.

The phrase, “Great Commission Resurgence,” was originally coined by Lifeway Christian Resources President Thom Rainer; further defined by the Southeastern Seminary’s president, Danny Akin—in a Spring 2009 chapel address—“Axioms for a Great Commission Resurgence”—and championed by Johnny Hunt, Senior Pastor of Woodstock, Ga., First, and president of the Southern Baptist Convention.

Before the formal launch of the idea now turned movement, Union University President David Dockery convened two conferences in 2004 and 2007 on the Union campus which many believe served as the catalyst and a formal codification of Baptist Identity in this decade and Southern Baptist doctrine and polity in particular.

Dockery wrote a small book distributed at the Southern Baptist Convention titled Building Bridges (2007) and later wrote the book—Southern Baptist Consensus and Renewal—a volume which has received widespread appreciation from all quadrants of the SBC. His newest volume—Southern Baptist Identity: An Evangelical Denomination Faces the Future—is a compilation of the talks given across the span of the two Baptist Identity Conferences held on Union’s campus.

For this special edition of the Messenger Insight, Dockery answers questions about the initial progress report of the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force first presented on Feb. 22 to the Executive Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention.

Part I

Louie Devotie Newton— What is a Baptist?; Baptists before Southern Baptists?; The Baptist Association—its past and future; From associations to state conventions; The Triennial Convention of 1814—Adoniram Judson and Luther Rice; William B. Johnson—Two Plans Considered: One Convention or Missionary Society?; Disagreement from the start—Was the SBC a replacement for state conventions?; The SBC Foreign Mission Board and Domestic Mission Board in 1845—their means of support and development; “Agents” among the churches—fundraising among Southern Baptists in the 19th Century; The 75 Million Campaign and the 1920 SBC Conservation Committee; The Origin of the Cooperative Program; E.Y. Mullins and the Business and Efficiency Plan of 1928; Constant Changes in the Cooperative Program—Who does what?; Albert McClellan—state conventions always the CP promotional partner?; The SBC Executive Committee, state conventions, and the Cooperative Program; GCRTF—Return the CP to the states —a change?; A merger of the two mission boards in 1914?; Competition between entities and agencies of the SBC?; GCRTF—authority over national/state convention?; GCRTF Demographic changes demand change to impact lostness; GCRTF— Implementation over many years; A 50/50 split between the state and national convention?; State by state CP allocations—one size fits all?; GCRTF—Funds to the nations; The Cultural Mandate, The Great Commandment, and the Great Commission; Great Commission Partners.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

To download, right click and select “Save Link As”

Part II

State conventions and preferred items for CP promotion; state conventions —closer to the churches; GCRTF—an attempt to weaken state conventions?; What are cooperative agreements between NAMB and state conventions?; Albert Mohler and Glen Land on cooperative agreements—channeled and untraceable?; Too much or too little accountability in cooperative agreements?; NAMB’s funding matrix; state conventions are to “budget accordingly?”; The GCRTF—casting an overarching vision; GCRTF —Future conversations are imperative; The final GCRTF Report—Details to be worked out by state conventions, agencies, and entities; GCR —Re-prioritizing a missional culture for the SBC; Has the SBC moved away “from the primacy and centrality of the local church?”; Nashville is not Rome—Bottom up not top down; GCRTF—Baptists not bishops; 70 percent of SBC churches are plateaued or declining; Stewardship education remains imperative; GCRTF—Recommendation #2:  From whom should the NAMB “released” and to whom should the NAMB be “released”?; NAMB priorities —have they changed?; NAMB research error in reporting to the GCRTF—Will this change the final report?; Personal change in GCRTF members; The IMB—international missionaries on U.S. soil?; GCRTF—Movement toward one global mission board?; Great Commission Giving—the demise of the Cooperative Program?; GCRTF—CP designated/non-designated giving; CP not a priority for younger pastors—why?; Draper, Chapman, Henry —heroes of the CP; Union University, Baptist Identity Conferences, and the GCR; Johnny Hunt—Southern Baptist Consensus and Renewal; Balkanization of the SBC?; Why remain a Southern Baptist and be committed to a GCR?; The Gospel to the nations.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

To download, right click and select “Save Link As”

Play

Author: Staff

View more articles by Staff.

Share This Post On
  • http://martyduren.com Marty Duren

    A minor clarification, calls for reform and renewal in the SBC long predated the “Fall of 2008.” Thx.

    • Douglas Baker

      Thanks, Marty for the reminder. You are correct, and we certainly did not intend to imply that prior to the formal movement of the Great Commission Resurgence that nothing was done prior to 2008. The GCR did not spring “Ex nihilo nihil fit” at all. Thanks for the clarification.

  • http://simpsonfamilyokc.com Roger K. Simpson

    Thanks for staging this podcast. This is, to my knowledge, the most comprehensive and cogent “inside look” at the thinking behind the GCRTF’s interim report to date.

    It would really be helpful to stage a third part of this podcast to address topics such as: (a) laying out a cost/benefit analysis comparing defunding the of pioneer state conventions vs. “releasing” the NAMB, (b) addressing the question, “Is the task force’s report ‘budget neutral’ or do some entities and/or state conventions have to increase their budgets to enable the task force’s vision come to fruition?”

    I have all of Dr. Dockery’s books. In my opinion, he is a true leader in the SBC. I think he, more than anyone else, is a person that can take up the mantle and move this interim report to the next step to passage in Orlando.

    I’d judge that in terms of the “vision” the task force report is 9.9 on a scale of 10. In terms of “nuts and bolts” practicality the report is about 6 on a scale of 10.

    We need a core group of senior statesmen in the SBC to step up to the plate and fill in the blanks. We need someone that can pick up this ball and keep the drive going — all the way to the goal line. We can’t just penetrate the red zone and then run out of gas.

    It wouldn’t hurt if that statesman was our next SBC president: One who had impeccable CP credentials.

    .

    • Douglas Baker

      Thanks, Roger for your comment. Please pardon my lack of response to your earlier comments on my editorial. My schedule has largely prohibited me from responding as I would desire to those who comment on our website.

      As to your point about a third podcast, that is a good suggestion. Perhaps as the GCRTF moves forward in the work, that might indeed be something (pending the schedules of these men and women) which might be helpful.

  • Pingback: David Dockery on the Great Commission Resurgence « owen strachan

  • Pingback: Dockery on the Great Commission Resurgence – Justin Taylor

  • Pingback: Great Commission Resurgence Resources | THE CAPRANICA

  • Pingback: Great Commission Task Force podcast with David S. Dockery :: Baptist Messenger of Oklahoma

  • Pingback: Great Commission Task Force podcast with David S. Dockery, Part II :: Baptist Messenger of Oklahoma

More in Messenger Insight (196 of 274 articles)


“I have a picture in my mind of the majesty of Christ like the sun at the center of the ...